4.
Two soldiers agree to a plan to break into vending machines on post and steal the money therein.
The accused, one of the two soldiers, made a key to the machines in furtherance of the plan. The key
did not fit the lock and both soldiers were apprehended as they were trying to open one of the machines.
The accused may properly be charged with:
A.
no offense as the key would not have opened the machine.
B.
attempted larceny and conspiracy.
C.
attempted larceny only.
D.
conspiracy and larceny.
5.
The accused broke into and entered the unit supply room one evening with the intent of stealing
some field equipment. The supply sergeant who had worked late and had fallen asleep in a chair awoke
and the accused ran away without taking anything. The accused has been charged with burglary. He
may properly be convicted of:
A.
burglary.
B.
larceny.
C.
attempted burglary.
D.
housebreaking.
6.
Which of the following is a true statement regarding specific intent crimes?
A.
Intent is a necessary element of the crime and must be proven in order to secure a
conviction.
B.
Intent need not be proven because it is inferred from the commission of the criminal act
itself.
C.
Specific intent crimes can be committed by mistake.
D.
None of the above.
7.
Specific intent may be proven through:
A.
circumstantial evidence.
B.
the accused's statements.
C.
both A and B.
D.
none of the above.
8.
Which of the following is a true statement regarding general intent crimes?
A.
Intent is a necessary element of the crime and must be proven in order to secure a
conviction.
B.
The prosecution must prove that the accused's actions were not accidental.
C.
General intent crimes cannot be committed by mistake.
D.
None of the above.
1-67
MP1019
Previous Page
