6.
A spontaneous statement is:
A.
admissible, but only if reduced to writing.
B.
admissible, but only if under oath.
C.
admissible, but only if the suspect has first been advised of his
rights under Article 31.
D.
none of the above.
7.
If a suspect is making a spontaneous statement:
A.
he must be interrupted and advised of his rights to an attorney.
B.
he must be interrupted and advised of his rights under Article 31,
UCMJ.
C.
the statement will be admissible in court.
D.
the statement will be admissible at an administrative proceeding,
but not at a court-martial.
8.
When a suspect says he wants an attorney:
A.
the interrogator must not question him again for at least two hours.
B.
the questioning must cease immediately.
C.
the suspect can only be questioned further if it is done by a
different questioner.
D.
the suspect may be encouraged to change his mind.
9.
If a suspect is questioned without a prior advisement of his rights:
A.
the confession that he makes is not admissible in court.
B.
his confession will be admissible, but only if it is made under
oath.
C.
his confession is admissible, but only if there are two independent
witnesses.
D.
the confession will be admissible, but only under the "mere felony
rule."
10.
If a suspect has been properly advised of his rights:
A.
any confession that he makes must still be found to be voluntary.
B.
his resulting confession will be admissible, regardless of the
circumstances of the interrogation.
C.
his confession will be admissible, but only if it is in writing.
D.
none of the above.
1-81
MP1020
Previous Page
